If Justin Bieber wins the WSOP Main Event…

July 15th, 2010

With online poker illegal in the USA and the world stuttering out of recession, we need a WSOP winner who can inspire millions to take up the game. Who could do this best, imagining we can pick anyone in the world?

1. Susan Boyle
45 million people have watched the Youtube video of Susan Boyle’s performance on Britain’s Got Talent. At first we judge her for her frumpy appearance; and then her soaring voice makes us feel almost euphoric, as we realize greatness can come from unexpected places. Her Main Event victory will be a bit like this too, as she spills over her drink, holds her cards up so that everyone can see them, and constantly has to ask other players what she gets for three pair.

The whole world will watch as Susan Boyle improbably romps home at the final table of the Main Event, defeating an ungracious Phil Hellmuth for the bracelet and $9 million first prize. Her victory, helped by her slightly batty and inappropriately flirtatious table-talk, shows poker to be a game for anybody, whatever their wealth or aptitude level. People of middling to low ability across the world will sign up to Gutshot Online hoping to repeat her victory over a rational universe. As for Susan Boyle, she’ll donate half her winnings to the local home for orphaned cats, and the rest will go on the PLO tables at The International.

Boyle has demonstrated an uneven temper, and a tendency to blow up when under stress, which might limit her chances of outlasting a field of 7000 players. And, although she’s a naturally gifted singer, it is not yet known if this gift extends to understanding the mathematical concepts behind tournament poker. She knows when to sing, but does she know when to shove?

She’s never been given the chance before, but here’s hoping it’ll change. Let’s dream the dream!

2. Carla Bruni
Carla’s Main Event run will be characterized by a grace, beauty and glamour seldom seen in the ugly-male dominated world of professional poker. She’ll defeat Dave “Devilfish” Ulliott” heads-up for the bracelet, and he’ll respond with an tirade obscene enough to make Mel Gibson blush. A funky-house producer in a Paris loft will sample and remix Ulliot’s rant into a disco tune that will become a hit across the French Republic.

In the presidential bedroom, Carla will convince her husband, Nicholas Sarkozy, to abolish the new law requiring online poker companies to set up taxed sites restricted to French players. Every Frenchman – whether a vigneron, boulanger or plombier – will start playing online poker so that they, too, can sock it to their old foes the English. Boules will no longer clink on Petanque pitches on Sunday afternoons, as men in stripy jumpers stay inside playing PokerStars tournaments. And French women will play too, picking up poker as readily as a dress or perfume they’d seen Carla Bruni wearing.

And we shall all grow rich.

3. Hu Jintao
The current leader of the People’s Republic of China has not yet won a WSOP bracelet. The population of China is 1.3 billion. Even if you discount agricultural and factory workers for whom a Neteller account is not a priority, a WSOP victory by the Chinese Premier would lead to hundreds of millions of new poker players.

Many of these new players would be really, really bad. They’d think the essential Red Book was by Chairman Mao, when us poker players know it’s actually Expert Strategy for No Limit Tournaments: The Endgame by Dan Harrington. Billions of dollars of new money would pour into the poker economy.

But within a few years of Hu Jintao’s victory, there would have been a poker revolution. Hundreds of millions of Chinese players studying and playing poker full time would have absolutely devastating consequences. Your typical undisciplined young Western player multi-tables while browsing shemale porn, chatting on MSN and listening to music on Spotify. They would be absolutely crushed.

We should be grateful Hu Jintao’s interest in poker remains understated, and possibly non-existent.

4. Justin Bieber
If the Canadian teen pop star Justin Bieber was to win the Main Event by defeating a clearly inebriated Scotty Nguyen, the universe would almost explode with an epicness. It would be like the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games, the World Cup final, and the ending of Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure, all rolled into one; the greatest feel-good global moment in the history of humanity.

Rather than being associated with grumbling old men in smoky backrooms, poker would be associated with happy, chirpy teenagers, hope, ambition, and every positive, slightly annoying virtue you can think of. As WSOP Champion, Justin Bieber would embody the unrealistically hopeful dreams of young people everywhere.

You might expect skilled poker players would be able to beat the Bieber Beavers without much effort.  But we must not underestimate the power of females to bewilder socially awkward young men.  Some geeky guys  would lose to the girls on purpose, having been reminded of urges other than for money.   Steady grinders would declare poker had become unbeatable.   After all, how can you play against an infinitely bankrolled army of totally irrational teenage girls?

In truth, none of these people are left in this year’s Main Event. The Pope, Barack Obama, Jedward, and Twilight star Robert Pattinson are also notably absent. We must make do with the players we have.

Of those left, the best result would be a victory for Johnny Chan. Think how many people saw Chan in Rounders, but are no longer active poker players. Many would try poker again if they saw him winning a third Main Event title.

A victory for Johnny Chan would also really, really annoy Phil Hellmuth. For that reason alone, it’s worth hoping for.

I writ some letters to some poker players, 2

June 7th, 2010

I have many questions about poker and so I have written some more letters:

I writ some letters to some poker players

June 4th, 2010

Hi there, my name is Thomas Gullen and I write letters to various companies and people. My favorite animals are cats (meow) and plankton (fffffttt fffffft).

Recently I started writing to some poker players and companies with some ideas and questions, as well as some letters about problems I have been experiencing that I would like resolved.

This is the first in a series of letters I have written, come back next week for more, and maybe I would have received some replies by then as well!

I didn’t want to go to that pool party anyway

June 1st, 2010

This week I became slightly obsessed with a man who seemed to have been photographed in a compromising position at a Cannes pool party held by a Cake poker skin:

The party looks like it was attended by poker players, affiliates, models, a dwarf and two cyberpunk dancers. Carl Cox was the DJ. Most people there had been paid to attend. The man in this photo looked like an old rake in a blandly handsome crowd. I downloaded the zip of photos and found him twice more:

I cut out the outline of his head, and started making quick, unsophisticated pictures with MSPaint:

I made them out of boredom, resisting the impulse to do something better with my time. But I later realized what I was reacting against. I’d felt a familiar mixture of envy and revulsion as I’d looked through the party pictures. Why did the poker site put up 700 megs of pictures from the party, if not to make us feel the desperate lust of exclusion? Are we to applaud the youth, beauty of the partygoers, wish we were there; wish we had what they had? Yes, you might say, the guys at this poker party look like tossers. But they are rich, young tossers, and their women have the immaculate beauty of a new textbook. That’s what money looks like. And we’re not invited.

I posted my pictures to 2+2. where RiverFenix, De_Neuro and No Fortune made these GIFs:


But I was the only one obsessed by this man. His expression is as impenetrable as the Mona Lisa. Is he surprised? startled? complacent? contented? mildly irritated? The whole of human emotion is in that face.

I’ve only once been to a pool party, but it was in an location to rival Cannes. On Capri, five years ago, I went to an “Angels of Love” house music party. There were dancers on a floating platform in the middle of the pool, and the crowd danced around the side. Everyone seemed beautiful and immaculately dressed, though later I saw there was a neatness to it that was too precise, too concerned with image, and perhaps a little dull. The crowd was not entirely exclusive, either, since some rough types had taken the boat from Naples, though in my keenness to feel excluded from some impossibly rich beautiful world I didn’t much notice them. I danced, didn’t drink, and didn’t speak to anyone other than my fellow language students I’d arrived with. As the bus drove us back to Capri town, it stopped to drop off Italians at their holiday villas where they were spending the summer, and I naturally chose to feel a Gatsbyesque exclusion as I watched them kiss goodbye.

I made more pictures. I wondered what the unknown partygoer was doing whilst I inserted his head into a range of inappropriate situations. Maybe by now he was on a yacht on the French Riviera, a private club in Manhattan, or in a Moroccan bordello? I felt a mild guilt – he’s done nothing to me. I realized that I actually liked him, for looking slightly raffish and seedy; and out of place, as I would be out of place. It was the young men I really disliked, with their clean complexions and T-Shirts over six-packs.

The PhotoShop assault is the tool of the powerless, of the basement dweller, of the loser, at home in their bedroom in their parent’s house. They can be used for humour, or for political purposes, as we saw with the recent election posters. But perhaps ultimately all they do is contribute to an endless stream of images; just more noise.

I didn’t want to go to that pool party anyway.


LuckyJimm’s 2+2 Degeneracy Roundup

May 25th, 2010

Poker players often don’t know how to manage money away from the table. Legend has it that back in 1983 Chip Reese paid a $2000 monthly water bill without complaint. Some time later someone pointed out his pipes had burst.

This week a poster on 2+2 asked whether it’s possible to live in New York on $65,000 a year. He spends a remarkable $800 a month on groceries, including $20 on olive oil and $35 on aftershave. And it transpired that on top of his $500 monthly credit card repayment and $1600 rent, he’s wholly supporting his girlfriend. The 600+ posts that followed debated whether it’s better to live like a king in distant exile (somewhere like Iowa), or like a mouse in the skirting boards of the big city. Some posters like jmakinmecrazy were bemused by how much money most poker players need to live. Maybe New York is a more expensive city than London because, as Katherine Hibbert showed, you can live in London for almost nothing. Or maybe you just get used to drinking aftershave.

In other news, a Finnish poster in BBV4L describes his job pretending to be a woman for an SMS dating service. Lonely divorced men in their 40s or 50s spend up to 2000 Euros a month to receive his texts, and speak longingly of their desire for a shared future. At the point they announce plans to sell their houses and move across the world to be with him, he senses it’s time to delicately bring their budding love affair to a close, and then wait for the next lonely man to text in.

When imaginary women won’t do, you can always try picking up women in the quietly erotic environment of your college library. The girls glanced across the room seem so beautiful precisely because you can’t easily talk. On summer days in the British Library I’ve fallen in love more times than Casanova. You might think it easier to approach them if you have the presumed advantage of an English accent in America. But, sadly, Gullanian reports this doesn’t always work. JaprielP’s sober advice reminds us that most people visit libraries to study, not be harassed by bookish inadequates. Finally, OMGMileyCyrus explains how to get the phone number of the studious girl of your dreams.

In BBV, we read of a classic PLO spin-up, where one player, disregarding the delicate science of bankroll management, managed to turn $10 to $1000 in six hours. I applaud his lack of bankroll management – but from the look of the graphs and stats he posted, he seems to have some kind of software installed, and is clearly taking the game way too seriously to be a true spin-up degen. PLO spin-ups are great fun – why not set up an account on Gutshot Poker and have a go yourself?

Over in the Las Vegas Life forum, a man who lives twenty minutes away from the Las Vegas strip asks for advice on the best spots to sleep in his car, because twenty minutes is a long time to spend away from the casino, and $30 is too much to spend on a motel. This being a gambling forum, he receives serious answers rather than disdainful recommendations to seek medical help. The best suggestion is this scheme to get a free hotel room if you can hoodwink the maid in the middle of cleaning it. Because, when all your money’s gambling money, why waste a cent on a room?

Beauty before the bracelet? asks Tatjana Pasalic

May 18th, 2010

Poker presenter Tatjana Pasalic asks in her Party Poker blog if it would be better to have a “forever-young” face or a WSOP bracelet.

If she’s actually proposing eternal youth then, heck, I think I’d take that before a WSOP bracelet, though the Steve Soffa-designed bracelets for the 2010 WSOP are pretty sweet. And of course bracelets mean money, and winning $8.5 million or so for the main event would be nice.

But with the proliferation of WSOP events – 57 this year – winning a bracelet is arguably not what it once was. It’s not hard to squander the money. And then how will you feel in 30 years, with just a $1,500 Seven-Card Stud Hi-Low bracelet on the pillow beside you as you climb into an empty bed?

A WSOP bracelet is no longer a lifelong pass to fame, fortune, and excitable female attention. Just ask T.J. Cloutier. He was so broke he had to sell one of his WSOP bracelets to a pawnbroker, who put it up for sale on eBay in a high profile auction. Fortunately it was bought by Cake Poker (the network that runs the Gutshot site), and they handed it back to him. They paid just $4000 for it. He’s a famous player, so a WSOP bracelet belonging to an unknown would be worth even less.

An eternally youthful face has got to be worth more than that. But on closer inspection, Tatjana’s post doesn’t actually offer eternal youth or what theorists term “indefinite lifespan“. She just says you could forever keep the face you had in your youth. Whenever any genie offers to fulfill your deepest wish, you really have to check the terms and conditions. As Tatjana puts it, it’s only your face that stays youthful. As you aged, your body will still become haggard and old. You’d eventually have an 80 year old’s body with a 19 year old’s face. You’d be trapped in a Michael J Fox nightmare.

Also, she isn’t suggesting you could have a more beautiful face; simply that the one you’re born with wouldn’t be wearied by age. But if you were ugly as an old boot to begin with, you’ll be ugly as an old boot forever. So if at 19 you looked like Jimmy Fricke (adorable, yes, but beautiful, perhaps not), then you might as well go for the bracelet.

But if you look like Tatjana, forget asking the genie for a bracelet. Eternal youth would be so much more fun!

By the way, you can now get rakeback on Party Poker. Click the link to set up an account through us, and eternal youth and money will be yours!*

* Eternal youth not guaranteed. Eternal money is rather down to you.

LuckyJimm’s 2+2 Round-Up

May 14th, 2010

This is going to be a weekly column where I collect together a few posts which have caught my eye on 2+2. The emphasis will be on degeneracy, but in future I’ll also point you towards gossip, photoshops, and star news.

The Degen Stories thread continues to be a delight. There’s so much gold in these stories of lost money and dignity. There are stories there we can all vicariously enjoy. However low you’ve been, there are people who’ve been lower. Whatever madness gambling has led you into; people there have done worse. Here’s one particularly lyrical example, which begins “So I was playing live 200NL drunk off my ass, gambling with my last couple of hundred after blowing 800 bucks on blackjack, a lapdance, too much booze and a (disappointing) steak dinner”

A poster in BBV4L admits to being rejected by every single girl he has approached in his life. He’s probably only 18, so whatever. But other posters then trade tales of patheticness. Riina wins, with this account of a phone sex operator hanging up on him. That is, someone who was getting paid to keep him talking. His only consolation is that it was probably a man pretending to be a woman anyway.

A poster in News, Views and Gossip asks if it’s true that Phil Ivey and Patrick Antonius are the only two online poker players with lifetime winnings of over $10,000,000. HighStakesDB rather precisely state that Phil Ivey is up $15,666,862.77 since 2007 against Antonius’s still not-too-shabby win of $10,320,766.05. One wit suggests another $10m+ winner is Ultimate Bet cheat Russ Hamilton. But the truth is we just don’t know, since we don’t have any records for smaller networks or from before 2007. However much Durrrr has won in his career, he’s had a nasty three weeks, losing a staggering $4 million. It’s shocking that one of the world’s best players can drop so much money. Still, it could have been worse. At least Isildur1 wasn’t around.

isildur

Many of us start out playing poker in small home games with friends. But friendships have been lost over the poker table, as the game brings out the worst aspects of some people’s personalities. Here’s a thread where a guy asks how he can stop acting like a prick at a home game. Even though they’re “the most awesome people” in his life, he berates them for playing badly. He brags about understanding strategy and mathematics at the table, and then tilts angrily when they suck out on him. He says he’s managed to stop being a jerk when playing online or at the casino. So why can’t he keep his cool with his friends? Maybe friendship and poker don’t mix?

Here’s a thread where 2+2ers have been posting pictures of their pets. I liked Vintage00’s dog, Sherpa. I think every gambler – in fact, everybody – should have a pet dog. In those moments when you’ve lost all your money, there’s vomit down your trousers, you can’t find a phone sex operator who’ll talk to you and your friends all think you’re a jerk, it’s a great consolation to know your dog, at least, still loves you.

degenerate gambler

Imagine if poker players ran the country

May 7th, 2010

Imagine a bizarre alternative universe in which the next government will be made up of poker players, not politicians. Here’s how our next government might look:

Prime Minister: Ziigmund
Voters warmed to the 27 year old Finn when he proposed building an enormous waterslide in the centre of every town or village in the country. He is himself Finnish waterslide champion, and believes it can cure most of our nation’s ills. The estimated construction cost of this is £800 mega, but Ziigmund says he will raise this money by selling tequila shots in schools.

Chancellor of the Exchequer: Isildur1
Since our gold reserves were sold off to the lowest bidder, the Bank of England is in desperate need of a spin-up. Who better to take care of the finances of our nation – the future of our sick and infirm relations, our OAPs and soldiers overseas, – than the 19 year old Swede believed to be Isildur1?

In what political journalist Andrew Marrr has called a request unprecedented in the long history of parliamentary democracy, Isildur1 has agreed to become Chancellor only on condition he can wear a Kermit the Frog mask for all his government duties. The BBC have bought the broadcast rights to his games on Full Tilt. So the whole nation will be able to gather round their television sets to watch him try to spin up our money; just as, generations ago, they gathered round their wirelesses to listen to the wartime speeches of Winston Churchill. Viktor will fight them on the 200/400 tables, on the 300/600 tables, on the 500/1000 tables, and he will never surrender. His opponents will be a trio of Americans, believed to be backed by the Federal Reserve, under a scheme known as the Hastings Plan. Isildur1 will be given an initial £90,000,000,000 to try to spin up. The nation depends on his success!

Foreign Secretary: FullFlush
This is a position which requires the mastery of many languages, and great cultural understanding, tact and sensitivity. And yet the Foreign Secretary must also have a Machiavellian side, able to balance sometimes conflicting interests and to advance the cause of our nation in sometimes underhand ways. The Foreign Secretary represents us on the world stage and promotes British interests abroad, taking part in delicate negotiations with foreign leaders and dignitaries. It is hardly a position for an uncouth brute in an ill-fitting T-shirt with a potty mouth and the temperament of an uncommonly malicious baby.

And yet, somehow, this is the role FullFlush now finds himself in. He has already spoken at length of his interest in one particular privilege he will enjoy as Foreign Secretary. His official duties will see him attend ambassadorial receptions held at embassies all over the world. The drink flows freely at these events, and the sandwiches are there for the taking. Salmon, cucumber, cheese and tomato; there is no sandwich too exclusive to be eaten by the holder of Her Majesty’s high office. FullFlush, in this aspect of the job if in no other, will do his country proud.

Secretary of State for Transport: Tony G
It’s a politically sensitive issue to tell voters to end their reliance on the motorcar. And that the solution isn’t more roads; it’s for people to live, shop and socialize nearer to where they work; to end the culture of commuting. But Tony G ‘ who himself drives a hummer ‘ has certainly shown he has the political will to push forward a fundamental change in this country’s transport system. With subsidized bicycles available to all and a mandatory death sentence for anyone found guilty of stealing a bicycle, we will soon be a happy cycling nation like Holland, but with public executions. As Tony G put it during his election campaign, ‘On yer bike!!’

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Doyle Brunson
This nation faces an unprecedented pension crisis, with the deficit said to be running into hundreds of billions of pounds. Doyle Brunson is just the man to sort this out. He knows all about being a pensioner ‘ he’s been one since before most of us were born. And yet you never see him queuing up outside a Post Office in rural England anxiously waiting to receive his pension, having failed to make any other provision for himself. Why not? Because he lives in Texas, some of you might say. But that isn’t the real reason. Doyle is a rugged individualist, a frontier man, an old school road gambler who always knew how to hustle up a stake, how to find a game, and how to beat it. He doesn’t need the welfare state to help him. And, with his help, neither will this nation’s pensioners. He’s going to make toughened poker playing road gamblers of our nation’s grannies.

Doyle plans to spend the next four years travelling the country in his bright red Oldsmobile, visiting bingo halls, bowls clubs, village gardening clubs, matinee theatre performances, and other places where pensioners are known to congregate. He’ll teach them how to play the Cadillac of poker, and advice them to replace their knitted hats with stetsons, and pack a barking iron in their handbags next to their bus pass just in case of trouble. With Doyle’s help, our nation’s old folk will learn how look after themselves at the poker table. Their Post Office pension will in future be paid straight into their online poker accounts; and their Winter Fuel Allowance will be paid in the form of a bonus on an online blackjack site.

Our wise new leaders Ziigmund, Isildur1, FullFlush, Tony G and Doyle Brunson will make this country great again!

How Much Is Your Time Worth As A Poker Player?

March 1st, 2010


An economics concept normally associated with international trade, which looks at ways where country A has an absolute advantage producing two commodities over country B (i.e. is better at producing both) yet they can find a way to trade with each other so the output of both commodities can increase, or savings can be made, by specialising in the commodity in which you are “most best” or “least worst.”

For some, that’s obvious, yet for others it’s counterintuitive that you should buy something from someone who is worse at producing it than you.

Mr. X is an industrial chemist and a keen amateur gardener. He earns £50 an hour as a chemist and could charge £20 an hour as a gardener. Mr. Y is a gardener that couldn’t get a job in the chemicals industry and earns £15 an hour as a gardener.

From a maths point of view, Mr. X has a comparative advantage in his day job; rather than spending four hours in his own garden, he should work four additional hours and pay Mr. Y to work eight hours in his garden. In theory, he ends up with more money and a better garden; in reality, he may enjoy gardening or need the exercise and fresh air.

What should Mr. Z do as a poker player earning £25 an hour?…

…continue reading this entry

Home

Is it Ever Correct To Leave A Good Game?

February 24th, 2010


One of the downsides of getting old is that there never seem to be any certainties any more. This is not a comment on the recent lack of “cannot fails” running in the second race at Lingfield, but an observation that, quite often, principles which when you were younger you held to be inviolate begin to develop grey fuzzy lines around the edges. Take the principle of “never leave a game while it’s good”. Now, in the old days, when you went out for an evening’s social poker, this was a non-question. You began when the game began and, unless you went broke, you ended when it ended.

In casinos you had more latitude. But the effort involved in getting to the casino in the first place made it unlikely that you would leave a bad game (you would wait for a while in the vague hope that it would improve) and even less likely that you would walk away from a good one.

So, as principles went, “never leave a good game” was about as clear-cut as they came.

Until the Internet.

I’ve observed three, sometimes contradictory, factors coming into play when I am in a good game…

…continue reading this entry

Home